Compression Boots: What’s the data? (Intermittent Pneumatic Compression) Our overall summary of this data has indicated that IPC can back its claims in regards to lactate clearance, flexibility and muscle soreness as a recovery tool. However, these devices were slightly outperformed in those same performance markers by active recovery protocols. In my opinion, the data suggests that we should really prioritize active recovery as a primary driver in recovery metrics and use these devices as an adjunct to that process until we see data suggesting otherwise. These studies are not numerous or conclusive enough to achieve a level of scientific evidence, but give solid enough data to drive potential best practices. Further research needs to be conducted to give us a better picture on how and when to best use these devices. If you have any topics you want to see covered in the future please drop them in the comments. This is not medical advice and please consult your doctor before using this device. Studies 1.) Hanson E, Stetter K, Li R, Thomas A (2013) An Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Device Reduces Blood Lactate Concentrations More Effectively Than Passive Recovery after Wingate Testing. J Athl Enhancement 2:3. doi:10.4172/2324-9080.1000115 2.) Sharma, Lalita & Hussain, MEjaz & Verma, Shalini. (2017). Effect of recovery modalities on blood lactate clearance. Saudi Journal of Sports Medicine. 17. 65. 10.4103/1319-6308.207577. 3.) Haun CT, Roberts MD, Romero MA, Osburn SC, Mobley CB, Anderson RG, Goodlett MD, Pascoe DD, Martin JS. Does external pneumatic compression treatment between bouts of overreaching resistance training sessions exert differential effects on molecular signaling and performance-related variables compared to passive recovery? An exploratory study. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0180429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180429. PMID: 28662152; PMCID: PMC5491247.