Replying to @dme1214 You almost had the point there at the beginning of your comment. But by the end, you once again shift the goalposts & talk about expansion when this was always about the fact that Rubio would, if he could, pass bills with NO EXCEPTIONS (which you said have never been presented & I showed you where you were wrong). The Idaho GOP was presenting bills with NO exceptions for the LIFE OR HEALTH of the mother & they declined to ADD it. You've been wrong from the second you opened your mouth to say this was a trap "because they should have worded it differently". No. They worded it the way it needed to be worded to prove that #rubio would gladly pass abortion bills with no exceptions for r*pe, inc*st, and possibly such a very narrow definition of "life of the mother" that it would not actually save her life, and especially not her health. I've proven more than adequately that such bills exist & that they are putting women & girls at risk.